Search This Blog

Sunday, March 25, 2012

In the Amazon jungle there are 900 different species of wasps. Probably not something your travel agent is likely to let you in on...

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

I find it very curious that some people who profess to follow Jesus find him to be so effete that they feel compelled to defend him all the time.

Monday, March 12, 2012

Check out my new post on The Buddhist Christian Blog:


One of the things that I really appreciate about Buddhism that is present much more covertly in Christianity is the notion that it is through my practice that I transform the world. Mind you, I am not advocating for isolationist spiritualities. There are more than enough people in every religion imaginable, as well as in the spiritual but not religious camp, who treat their spiritual practice as if it was their little party and will thank you very much not to interrupt it. That attitude isn't spiritual at all, it's profoundly narcissistic - a field day for the ego that serves no good purpose because it reinforces our already problematic belief that we are the center of the universe, thank you very much for noticing.

I believe that healthy spirituality always leads us to care for others. I also believe that we can have all sorts of motivations for caring about others, a good many of them rather self-destructive. We might care for others to build what I call our spiritual resume. This is especially prevalent in Christianity, where despite all of the teaching about God being loving, forgiving, and "saving" us through grace, most people still keep close track of their good deeds so that in the event that we should arrive at the pearly gates of heaven and the powers that be have not been duly informed of just how wonderful we are we can simply pull out our spiritual resume and clear the whole matter up before it gets out of hand, thank you very much. The problem with spiritual resumes is that they make our selfless acts of compassion and caring for others selfish rather than selfless. We don't care at all about Mildred, whom we are visiting in the retirement home, we are using her in hopes of saving our own butts at the gates of heaven.

His Holiness the XIV Dalai Lama has taught extensively that (to paraphrase) peace is achieved one person at a time. We can hardly work for peace unless we have peace in our hearts. Of course, we don't have to be perfect before having an impact. Each step along the way toward peacefulness makes an impact. We don't have to sit in our rooms until we can emerge enlightened - if we did, we might miss lifetimes of opportunities to alleviate suffering here and now. I believe we do have to stay in our rooms until we see the truth of interconnectedness. An effective exercise in this endeavor is to count the number of people, places, and things we encounter in the course of a single twenty-four hour period that we brought to our life without any assistance. The answer may surprise you. It will also cause you to begin to appreciate just how interdependent we really are.

There are countless causes battling for our attention - in itself a curious and at times at least spiritually violent process. It seems that everyone with a case of indigestion wants to start a petition on I have started to evaluate those requests and the causes I support or am otherwise connected with in terms of whether the increase the polarization in our already divisive society or whether they are able to take a position without demonizing the other. Would it surprise you if I told you not one has passed the test?

Of course, that may be a sign that people who understand non-duality need to make themselves available to the many important organizations that work for justice in our world. Changing what has become common practice will not be easy. What we may need are people who are very well grounded in their own spiritual practice and understanding of interconnectedness to start or join existing organizations that operate from this understanding. There are some that exist already, and there is certainly room for more. We could also talk with our friends and family about the truth that even those we disagree with are at the very least our brothers and sisters.

Whatever we decide, it is important that it is grounded in our spiritual practice, that we continue to transform and grow on our own journey. We don't need to have all the answers today, no matter what our hell bent for speed society would like us to believe. Our culture didn't get into this mess overnight, and it isn't going to be transformed overnight. As individual practitioners, if we rush in without adequate grounding and preparation all we will do is burn out - which, because of interconnectedness, hurts all of us.


Monday, March 5, 2012

New Blog Talk Radio Program

I am excited to announce that the Wednesday Christ Enlight Blog Talk Radio program, which airs at 11am eastern, 10am central, 9am mountain, and 8am pacific time, has a new format beginning this week.  The focus of the program will be the focus of this blog - the Buddhist Christian experience!  We'll look at a variety of topics from the perspective of the intersection of Buddhist and Christian spiritualities.  I hope you will join me!

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Says Who?

"You cant be both Christian and Buddhist."  It's a frequent refrain from both sides of the aisle, and it's compete nonsense.  My response to the statement is always a question, "Says who?"  That usually elicits either a very smug "me" or a list of theological reasons, so to speak, why it simply isn't possible.  To the smug answer my response is always to nicely ask who left them in charge of the tradition.  The theological reasons are always based in presumptions about my beliefs that simply aren't true.  The trump card, however, the ultimate response to the claim that you can't be both Christian and Buddhist, is the reality that I are one - no matter whether it's possible or not.  Which means, of course, that is is completely possible.  What's more, I'm not alone.  I have encountered plenty of people who identify as a blend of an Abrahamic faith and Buddhism.  From Buddhapalians to Jewbuhs, they are out there in droves.  I do admit, I haven't ever met a Buhslim or a Musdist, but they may be out there.

As far as Christian Buddhists go, the usual "big three" theological objections are the following:

1.  Christians believe that Jesus is the Son of God, and Buddhists don't believe in a creator God.  Although the Buddha refused to comment on the concept of God, Buddhists believe that the universe always has been and always will be.

1A.  My answer to this is that I do not believe that Jesus is the biological or unique son of God and I don't believe that Jesus understood himself in either of those ways.  He most likely believed that he was the son of God in the way that every human being is a son or daughter of God.  If by creator God you mean a God with a big old workshop filled with tools in which everything was created, then I don't believe in a creator God either.  I do believe that God has always been and always will be, and was the energy that caused our universe to come into physical being, which is pretty much the same as the universe having always been and always continuing.  Granted the form will change, but since Buddhists believe form is emptiness that shouldn't be an issue.

2.  Christians believe that Jesus died to save them from their sins and, except for Pure Land Buddhists, Buddhists don't believe in an external savior or power.  Rather, Buddhists believe that all people have Buddha Nature and need to clear away the obscurations currently concealing their Buddha Nature.

2A.  My answer is that not all Christians believe in atonement theology, and I certainly don't believe in it.  I am just fine with Buddha Nature, and find it to be amazingly parallel to the notions of Christ Consciousness (I actually prefer the term God Consciousness or God Nature) and/or indwelling Divinity being present in all human beings.

3.  Budhhists believe in reincarnation while Christians believe in one unique life.

3A.  Both statements are imprecise and therefore problematic.  Buddhists actually believe in rebirth, which is best understood as a less specific form of continuation than reincarnation, which is actually a Hindu belief.  In either event, there have long been - back to the earliest Church - Christians who believed in reincarnation.  The differences and the nuances are far from insurmountable.

Conclusions.  Of course, there are other objections.  The one thing all of the objections have in common is that they assume an orthodox or pseudo Christian perspective.  Jamyang Khyentse wrote a book entitled Why You're not a Buddhist that assumed an orthodox Tibetan Buddhist perspective.  Ironically, Tibetan Buddhism is the latest developing major school in Buddhism and is much different from Zen and Theravadan Buddhism.  Were the same standards applied to the then emerging Tibetan Buddhism by Zen and Theravadan Buddhists one cannot help but wonder if they would have been defined as Buddhist or not.

Once again we are confronted with the issue of what constitutes a gate keeper into a tradition.  Certainly, an individual teacher or Bishop has every right to determine who they accept as a member of their particular corner of their tradition.  However, traditions are broader than any one manifestation of a tradition.  So often, there is a drive to maintain orthodoxy that is partly understandable but partly a manifestation of an unhealthy desire to control what should be a living, growing thing that risks killing it.

We are in a period of evolving spirituality.  On the Christian side, the mainlines have imploded and what will emerge from the ashes remains to be seen.  On the Buddhist side, a uniquely American Buddhism is in the process of emerging.  Both traditions are evolving and very fluid, a word that applies to the entire contemporary spiritual landscape.  Try as they might, traditionalists will be unable to control the process.  The good news is that teachers like Tara Brach are finding ways to hold open a spacious presentation of an emerging American Buddhism that leaves room for people from diverse backgrounds and beliefs.  As someone from a Christian background, I appreciate teachers like Tara who resist the temptation to allow former Christians to poison a group by instituting an anti-Christian bias.  That bias has poisoned the Unitarian Universalist and New Thought movements as well as parts of the emerging American Buddhist tradition.  We need to be in a space where people are encouraged to deal with residual issues from their former traditions rather than carry them forward and inflict them on other groups.

In the end, whether individual people from their own perspective want to admit it or not, there are Christian Buddhists and Buddhist Christians and a collection of other blended spiritual perspectives.  That is always a good thing, because it indicates that people are interacting with their spiritual selves.  The worst thing that can happen on the spiritual path isn't experimentation, it's apathy.  As this process continues, those with a vested interest in their particular institution will resist the changes that emerge.  That speaks more to what people do when they sense they are losing their power than it speaks to this process.  Some are bound to take things to a place that is unrecognizable.  We need to recognize that is perfectly acceptable if our goal is that people find their authentic spiritual selves.  For those of us who have no choice but to ask the tough questions, it's an exciting time to be alive.